Sunday, 25 October 2015

Giving You The Last Fatal Duel in England was in 1852.

Louis Napoleon’s coup d’état of 1848 caused a hive of activity among France’s socialist fractions - small groups of political dissidents who tried in vain to bring about counter revolutions against the late Napoleon Bonaparte’s nephew.

Among these disgruntled people was a large course man who had only been released from prison a year earlier. This man had killed a gendarme in 1839. His name was Emmanuel Barthelemy and he was a member of the Blanquist society – a French socialist movement. Among such members was Karl Marx. Barthelemy had a strong dislike of Marx and even plotted to have him killed. This was when many of the French dissidents had come to England as political refugees.

Emmanuel Barthelemy spent the first few years, in England, among his fellow countrymen in exile, but many of these left wing groups squabbled with one another more than they did against the French government in power that had brought about their exile. Barthelemy was regarded as one of the most argumentative of them all. He was tall and a brash bully. Many regarded him as a loose cannon and a murderer too.

By 1852 he had been in England a few years and his unruly reputation as a bully with a short fuse grew all the more. He picked an argument with another French dissident from a different political fraction. An ex-naval officer called Lieutenant Frederic Cournet. He had read out Victor Hugo’s proclamation during a botched attempt at overthrowing the Napoleon III government in 1851.

Cournet had been in England for only a matter of weeks when Barthelemy challenged him to a duel to settle a difference of opinion. Barthelemy claimed that the ex-navy officer had said something detrimental about a former girlfriend. Lieutenant Frederic Cournet accepted the challenge with great confidence. He had fought a number of duels and had won them all. It was also a chance to put the unscrupulous bully to rights.

Each man selected two seconders and decided upon a field outside London close to a place called Engle field Green in Surrey. The field area was known as Priest Hill. The group of men set off aboard a train and travelled to their destination of Windsor Rail station and thence to Englefield Green. Six men in all, including the two duellists. It was 19th October 1852.

Once upon the secluded field, the seconders gave each man a pistol. Frederic Cournet had won the toss of the coin and got to choose weapons. The choice of pistols was not to Barthelemy’s liking as he felt more competent with a sword. Also Cournet was said to be a marksmen with other duelling victories under his belt. He also got to take the first shot as he had won the flick of the coin when the duel had been decided.

Both men stood sideways to present as small a target as possible. Then against all odds Lieutenant Frederic Courbet fired and missed Barthelemy completely. The ruthless Emmanuel Barthelemy may have grinned as he raised his pistol, but as he took aim and pulled the trigger the pistol jammed. The entire affair came to a brief halt as Cournet came forward and offered the use of his own recently fired pistol. One of Barthelemy’s seconders reloaded the pistol that Courbet had used. The ex-navy Lieutenant resumed his stance with ill deserved, or perhaps misplaced, courtesy and awaited Emmanuel Barthelemy’s second attention.

This time the pistol worked and Frederic Courbet let out a cry of pain as the musket ball ripped into his chest. He fell a victim to his gallant consideration and Barthelemy’s sure aim. As the mortally wounded man hit to the ground, Barthelemy and his two seconders took the pistols and re-packed them. They made off immediately for the rail station and a train back to London. Also one of Cournet’s seconders hastened away too. The stricken duellist’s other seconder, Edmund Allain, remained to try and get help. He left the field and ran out onto a country lane to stop an approaching horse and trap. By chance it was being driven by Doctor Hayward who went to the stricken Cournet’s aid. The doctor and Edmund Allain managed to get Cournet onto the trap and then to the village pub called the Barley Mow. The police were called amid the village excitement and Superintendent William Biddlecombe was soon at the scene. He wasted no time in alerting the police at London upon hearing that the other duellist and seconders had boarded a train for bound for Waterloo station.

Upon getting off the train at Waterloo station Barthelemy and seconders, save one, were arrested and brought back to Windsor. One managed to evaded capture and saunter off into the crowd while disembarking from the train. His name was Brissot and he had the two pistols that he returned to the gun shop to reclaim his deposit. He made his way back to France and evaded capture for his part in the duel.

Despite Doctor Hayward’s efforts he was unable to save Lieutenant Frederic Cournet. After several hours the Frenchman died of his wounds in considerable discomfort.

Some months later, Emmanuel Barthelemy went to court with two others and it was he who stood trail for the murder of Lieutenant Frederic Cournet. The French custom of honour and duelling was not recognised by English law. However, during the course of the trial, Emmanuel Barthelemy and his legal team managed to convince the jury with eloquent speeches of being ignorant of English law as far as European duelling was concerned. The jury was won over and they returned a verdict of manslaughter which only covered a term of seven months in prison. Five months of which they had already spent on remand. They served a further two months and were released as free men.This was the last recoded fatal duel in England. 

There would be a further twist to Emmanuel Barthelemy’s story, however. Two years later, the unruly man would try to blackmail an employer. Barthelemy visited the man’s home to execute his blackmail plan, but it did not work. During the altercation and fight that preceded the attempted blackmail, Barthelemy would shoot his employer dead. As he tried to make his way out of the back yard of the house, another man would try to apprehend him and he would also be fatally shot. As Barthelemy continued with his escape attempt from his botched blackmail attempt, he would be stopped by another witness and then more would wrestle and hold him to the ground until the police arrived to arrest him.

During his second trail there would be no smooth talk to the jury. He was found guilty of murder and hanged publicly outside Newgate prison in January of 1855.   






 .







Odd Ideas For A Thrilling Steampunk/Sci-Fi Adventure



This pastiche SciFi story was inspired by H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds set in Victorian Britain in the year 1898. I suppose it crosses a number of genres in this day and age. Obviously Science Fiction, but also Alternative Reality and even Steampunk. 

I went on a journey of discovery trying to imagine what H.M.S. Thunder Child might have looked like and fell fancifully in love with the first revolving turret ship without sails. It was H.M.S. Devastation - blogs of which are featured here. She also had a sister ship called HMS Thunderer.

At first, these revolving ship's had muzzle-loading guns with short stumpy barrels that barely protruded from the gun ports. I wanted to keep these on the ship of 1898. Even though they were obsolete by such times. I used poetic license to do such a thing and used a credible excuse.

The whole endeavour of this written work was done during an evening school writing class and it sort of developed from there. It was a wonderful project that I found most absorbing. I got it edited properly and a front cover picture from an artist living in Cambridgeshire.

It cannot be published in the UK or the EU until 2017, but the USA, CANADA, AUSTRALIA and NEW ZEALAND can sell it.




Read H.M.S. Thunder Child's adventure against the Martian tripods. Victorian Britain is now a dystopian land. The world has gone mad and the British Empire is exposed to all the weakness it has against an alien technology it cannot compete against. One small outdated ironclad steps up to the mark with a brave crew. In the River Blackwater, Thunder Child makes a defiant stand. Follow the crew and her last voyage.

Enlarge image and get a better view of the internal ship


My Pastiche novel about H.G. Wells' fictional battleship H.M.S. Thunder Child (The Last Days of Thunder Child) was based on H.M.S. Devastation. In my imagination, I could see this design for Thunder Child going into battle against three Martian tripods on the River Blackwater in the county of Essex, England, the UK in 1898.

Muzzleloading guns went obsolete around 1889. All Royal Navy ships, including Devastation, were converted to Breech loading. However, I invented a political excuse to keep Thunder Child antiquated and still retaining the short stubby muzzleloading guns inside revolving turrets. 

This was to give Thunder Child a feeling of being behind the times, but still plucky when the occasion demanded. The diagram above was found in a library book and then I was fortunate enough to find it online. This gives a great internal view of the working of H.M.S. Devastation and I used this plan for my vision of H.M.S. Thunder Child in The Last Days of Thunder Child by C.A. Powell. 

The book is only on sale in the USA at the moment but will be able to be sold in the EU and other places in 2017. On USA kindle, the novel is available for download and it can be bought in print too. Check out the advert below.




For reviews on Amazon.com USA please click here and scroll down.


H.M.S. Devastation in all her glory launched 1871 Portsmouth

The first recorded battleship to put to sea without the array of sail and rope was the Royal Navy’s H.M.S. Devastation. She was launched in Portsmouth on 12th July 1871 and was designed by Sir Edward J. Reed. She was the first of two Devastation class battleships – the other being H.M.S. Thunderer, her sister ship. She sat low in the water but her freeboard was raised above the stern and bow. The bow must have been awash with water when she ploughed through the high seas. In the above model, the waterline is roughly where the black paint meets the light brown. You can then imagine how much of the vessel sat below the water. At the bow, you can see the pointed ram, which is of course below the water line. The reason for building this ram was said to have come about after the successful ramming during the battle of Lissa in 1866. This was a battle that took place between the Austrian Empire and the Italian forces close to a small island in the Adriatic sea, close to Croatia. It was the first major battle between ironclads and one of the last to involve deliberate ramming. 








There were, of course, coal-driven ships, made of iron, about and they had been for some time, but for a ship to rely exclusively on steam engine gear as a means of propulsion; this was a first. She had two horizontal trunk engines – a design of John Penn of Greenwich and each of these engines drove screw propellers that moved the vessel at 13.5 knots (25.6km/h)




She could hold around 18,000 tons of fuel and this gave her a range of 5,500 miles, which was very good in 1871.




Note the small muzzle loading cannons barely protruding from the turret ports. They would be replaced with longer barrelled breech loaders in 1890. Also, note the gantry ladders leading down from the bridge on to the top of the turret. There was a ladder fixed to the back of the turret so crewmen could climb down onto the deck. The same could be done on the rear turret.

What gave her the look of the future battleships to come were her revolving turret guns, which we are familiar with when visualising battleships of the two world wars. However, her first guns placed inside the revolving turrets were muzzle loaded and barely protruded from the gun ports. The two guns to each turret would be rolled back on a small rail and the front would be tilted down so the muzzle was to the deck, where an opening leads to the deck below. Here, the armourers could load the guns by thrusting charge and shell up ducting and into the waiting gun muzzle. When this was done the guns were levelled and wheeled forward towards the gun ports.


It is said that this particular turret and gun design were the same as those used on an earlier invention by a man called Captain Cowper Phipps Coles. He had the same turrets on the ill-fated H.M.S. Captain – a ship that had masts as well as the steam engines and iron turrets. She sank off of Cape Finisterre with many of the crew including Cowper Phipps Coles. Only 18 men of a compliment of 500 survived the terrible event.





H.M.S. Devastation’s revolving forward and aft turret guns gave the ability to fire at 260 degrees. She never saw action, though there is an American blog that states she did during the Crimean war. This, of course, is untrue because she was not built until 1871 and the Crimean War was in the early 1850s. There was, however, an earlier H.M.S. Devastation sailing ship and maybe she is recorded as having seen action at this time.


The turret battleship, H.M.S. Devastation was sent out to represent the UK in the Mediterranean and she was a very common sight in the island of Malta with her twelve-inch guns inside the strange turrets when other ships still displayed their broadside guns. She had a crew complement of 410 men.


Her sister ship, H.M.S. Thunderer suffered a terrible accident during a firing practice drill. It was in the aft turret – as both guns were rolled forward with charge and shell rammed down into each muzzle – the gunner ordered to fire. The gun crew covered their ears as both guns fired. However, just one gun went off and the other remained dormant. The gun crew, who cover their ears to mask the roar of the guns were unaware that one of the guns had not gone off. Each cannon was then wheeled back and dipped down to the loading opening in the turret floor which leads down to the deck below. Another shell and charge were rammed home – shell and charge sitting on top of another unexploded shell and charge. They were wheeled forward once again and when the gun master ordered the crew to fire, it was to be their last act as the explosion within the confines of the turret would have been dreadful. All men of the turret were killed. The consequence of this horrific accident hastened a change in all ship’s turret guns. The old muzzle-loading cannons were changed to the longer barrelled breech-loading guns. In 1890 H.M.S. Devastation was refitted with these new guns and other modification and then re-assigned to the First Reserve Fleet which was based in Scotland. By now she was old and there were many more modern and more powerful turret ships.
In 1908 she was sold for scrap and broken up, which was a shame, being as she was the first of her kind.



Other historical and navy stories:

First Submarine success of any war
http://thelastdaysofthunderchild.blogspot.com/2010/04/horace-lawson-hunley-and-confederate.html

H.M.S. Thunder Child
http://thelastdaysofthunderchild.blogspot.com/2011/04/thunder-child-to-peoples-imagination.html

CSS Alabama
http://thelastdaysofthunderchild.blogspot.com/2010/05/captain-semmes-of-css-alabama.html

China's civil war that claimed 30 million lives
http://thelastdaysofthunderchild.blogspot.com/2011/04/hong-xiuquan-and-taiping-rebellion-1850.html

Ship of the first Opium War
http://thelastdaysofthunderchild.blogspot.com/2011/04/great-britains-heic-nemesis-for-china.html

Cyclops class coastal defence ships
http://thelastdaysofthunderchild.blogspot.com/2011/04/hms-hecate-1871-cyclops-class-coastal.html

Victorian Royal Navy accident 
http://thelastdaysofthunderchild.blogspot.com/2011/04/hms-victorias-dreadful-mistake.html

Graf Spee commerce raider of WWII
http://thelastdaysofthunderchild.blogspot.com/2010/11/hans-langsdorff-of-admiral-graf-spee.html




What would it have been like for the crew of HMS Thunder Child? The fictitious ship from the War of the Worlds by H.G. Wells. 


I had a fascination with Victorian ironclads and the first revolving turret ships. These steel beasts of the British Empire never really saw the action of note because, during this day and age, the Royal Navy was very advanced with many ships to call upon to serve its vast empire. It was never put to the test until the time of the dreadnoughts in WWI. There was a 100 year period when Great Britain's navy cruised, at will, around the entire planet. Nothing of substance could face it upon our Earth. Nothing of note did. These wonderful ships came and went during that period of peace at sea, for Great Britain.

Then, to my delight, I read H.G.Wells' fabulous SciFi novel set in the Victorian era. This author created the ultimate for me. Nothing on Earth could face this proud navy. So he brought us 'off world aliens' from Mars in gigantic machines that roamed, at will, on three legs. The story contained a small exert of an old ironclad called HMS Thunder Child. It lasted but half a page within the novel but gave me cause to wonder.

I wanted the ship (Thunder Child) to be like HMS Devastation or HMS Thunderer the sister ship. They were among the first revolving turrets ships without sails. I wanted the old fictitious ironclad (HMS Thunder Child) to be like one of these. It would have been built in 1971 and therefore would be old by 1898. For poetic licence I wanted it to have retained its muzzleloading guns with short stumpy barrels that barely protruded from the revolving turret's ports. I needed to invent a reason for the old (and by this time) obsolete guns to still be in use. Muzzleloaders were changed for long barrel breech loaders across the Royal Navy in the 1880s decade, after a terrible accident with HMS Thunderer.

All this was created to give fictitious HMS Thunder Child an excuse to still have the muzzleloaders, years after them becoming obsolete in the Royal Navy. It lent the ship a vulnerability, to my mind, as I decided to write a pastiche novel set in H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds Universe. I wanted to go aboard Thunder Child in the days prior to her encounter with three Martian tripods in the River Blackwater, off the Coast of Maldon in Essex, England, UK. The River Blackwater is a small tributary that leads out into the North Sea. What happened in the days leading up to the dramatic event?

Writing - The Last Days of Thunder Child - a pastiche story 

It took me upon a fantasy of my own and an enjoyable adventure. It was a wonderfully engrossing project. If anyone reads H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds or even listens to Jeff Wayne's musical adaptation of the book, they will delight in the tale of Thunder Child's grand moment as the brave ironclad attacks the Martians to save a paddle steamer crammed with refugees.  I decided to go back a few days hence the confrontation and join the crew upon its journey that would lead to the ultimate meeting. 


Images below of Thunder Child and HMS Devastation - the way I imagined the fictitious ship from War of the Worlds.




Artist's impression of HMS Devastation in Malta


A Sci/Fi artist's great image of Thunder Child.
To enjoy The Last Days of Thunder Child - a pastiche from War of the Worlds please check out.



HMS Thunderer's starboard boiler
exploded in September 1876

H.M.S. Thunderer was the sister ship of H.M.S. Devastation. She was an early British Victorian battleship that suffered two major accidents in her early years. The first being an explosion on the 2nd September 1876.

One of her two boilers was overheating due to pressure valves corroding in the upper section. This was on her starboard boiler. Also, this boiler's pressure gauge was out of order so it was simply shut off. Such a thing is inconceivable today and its hard to think it was then, but as the starboard boiler began to overheat, the men in the engine room were unaware of the serious and deadly conditions they were working in. The commanding officer was down in the engine room at the time. (Perhaps he was there because of the fault.)

Starboard boiler after the explosion
While the commanding officer was in the vicinity, the top half of the boiler exploded killing 15 men instantly, including the commanding officer. A further 70 men were seriously injured, of which another 30 of these would die later from the wounds they suffered. 

As a result of this accident, new protocols were introduced concerning engine checks and stability - careful monitoring that had to be maintained and procedures concerning engine shutdown.

Then on 2nd of January 1879, a second accident aboard H.M.S. Thunderer brought about further changes within the Royal Navy. This time with the phasing out of muzzleloading turret guns to breechloaders with longer barrels. On this particular day after the New Year's Day, H.M.S. Thunderer was in the Sea of Marmora on a gunnery exercise.

H.M.S. Thunderer was testing her guns when the left-hand cannon of the fore turret had misfired. The right-hand gun had gone off but the left had not. The gunners inside the turret may have held their ears as the two guns were fired and so be unaware that only one gun had fired. When the muzzleloaders were wheeled back inside the turret, each gun barrel was lowered to hatches in the floor where ducting led down to the armourers below. They would slide a charge up the ducting into the waiting muzzle followed by a shell.
Fore turret destruction by left-hand guns double loading.
The gun crew and the armourers below deck would have been unaware that as the guns were rolled forward out of the turret's gun ports, the left-hand cannon had an explosive and shell sitting upon another explosive and shell. It was double loaded.

The order to fire was given and as the guns ignited the left-hand one exploded in the turret. The 12" gun of 38 tons of steel in the confines of metal walls was horrendous. The luckless gun crew inside the revolving turret did not stand much chance. 
Testing right-hand gun at Woolwich Arsenal
As a result, 11 men were killed and 34 wounded. At first, the crew were not sure what happened and the ship returned to Britain. The remaining right-hand gun of the fore turret was dismantled and taken to Woolwich Arsenal in London. The cannon wheeled inside a tunnel of a mounded hill composed of dirt and sandbags - an armoured cell of containment. It was double loaded to create the same condition. When the gun was fired it exploded in the same way and upon checking damage they were able to prove that this was the cause of the accident - double loading the barrel.

As a result, the Admiralty brought in a directive for all ships to have muzzleloaders withdrawn and replaced with breech loaders. This would prevent an accident of such nature occurring in future.


HMS Thunderer (British Royal Navy Devastation – class battleship)



This Victorian battleship brought about two major changes during the time of Queen Victoria’s Royal Navy because of two terrible accidents. HMS Thunderer was the sister ship of HMS Devastation – an ironclad revolving turret ship designed by Edward James Read. The ship was launched in 1872. Some of the innovations on Thunderer were regarded with suspicion by other designers. This would become well-founded because of the horrendous accidents she would suffer.



On 14 July 1876, there was a disastrous boiler explosion. Forty-five people were killed when one her eight box boilers burst. HMS Thunderer was cruising from Portsmouth Harbour doing a full power trial.



The terrible explosion tore through the hold and killed 15 people instantly. Among the dead was the ship’s captain. He was in the boiler room when the explosion occurred. About 70 others were injured besides the initial 15 killed, but a further 30 crewmen died later. In all 45 men lost their lives. The explosion brought a swift end to the boilers in use. They were replaced with Scotch cylindrical boilers.





The second serious accident occurred in January 1879 when one of the guns in the forward turret exploded during firing practice. This resulted in the deaths of 11 crewmen with 35 injured. The accident happened when a muzzle-loading gun was accidentally double loaded after a misfire. The gun crew inside the turret would cover their ears as both guns fired. Only one gun went off and the gun crew did not realise. They loaded another charge and shell on top of the one still inside the barrel. The consequences were terrible.



After this dreadful accident, the Royal Navy changed to breech-loading guns. It brought about better loading procedures. HMS Thunderer was re-equipped with longer barrelled breech-loading guns.


Other ships of similar build that caught my attention


Cyclops class ship
There is something about this coastal defence ship that I like. It was not really up to much and did not need to prove itself during its time in service with Queen Victoria's Royal Navy. It was an odd shaped little vessel and was rather ugly - yet it still flicks a little switch for me. HMS Hecate was one of four Cyclops class ships that Parliament wanted to be built because of the Franco - Prussian war in 1870.

Parliament regarded these ships as necessary because they were small and cheap with a shallow draft and offered coastal water defence. The attack-minded, Admiralty thought that because of their shallow draft, they might make good attack vessels in shallow water ports of the enemy. However, the majority of people believed them unfit for the open sea and heavy weather. The low fore and aft decks were often awash with sea even in conditions not regarded as severe.


Cyclops class like miniature versions of HMS Devastation.
Admiral George Alexander Ballard thought the armament was fine but stability in open sea questionable. He was known to have referred to the Cyclops class ships as 'fully armoured knights on donkeys.' This was perhaps cruel, but probably right. However, as coastal or riverboats, they were fine little ships.


HMS Hecate did make a journey across the North Sea and for this reason, I have a soft spot for her and the rest of these odd little ships. She had a complement of 156 men was 225ft from bow to stern with a beam of 45ft. She had two engines and a fore and aft turret, each with two 10 inch rifled muzzleloaders. The little lady could pack a punch if an enemy vessel was to get in her way.

These four ships (Cyclops, Hecate, Hydra and Gorgon) were smaller versions of the HMS Devastation class battleship. They had one funnel instead of the two that HMS Devastation had and looked like a miniature version of this first turret Battleship with no sails.

(Incidentally, there is an Australian Ship called HMVS Cerebus that was in service three years before HMS Devastation and is still about - part submerged in a bay off the Australian coast. She is very much like the Cyclops class ships but was built earlier. There is a Save the Cerebus movement to protect and look after this unique ship. You can find out more on: Friends of Cerebus Inc. Please click the link below.)

http://www.cerberus.com.au/index.html


Below is a newspaper report of HMS Hecate from the Glasgow Herald on 26th December 1883:

Some important experiments were made on Saturday off Plymouth on board the Hecate, 4, double-screw iron armour-plated turret-ship. This vessel, together with Gorgon, Cyclops, and Hydra, her sister ships, was built on the same principle as the Devastation, but on a much smaller scale. It was discovered that they could in no way stand rough weather, and the belief was that powerful as they were, they could only be used for coast defence. About twelve months ago it was proposed to erect a superstructure on one as a test, with a view to secure not only greater stability but better accommodation for officers and crew. The Hecate was selected to be experimented upon, and in January last Messrs H. & R. Green, of Blackwall, who was entrusted by the Admiralty with the work took, the ship in hand.


The improvement made included the extension of the breastwork to the ship's side and the lengthening aft about 20 feet. The captain's apartments are now within the superstructure, instead of below the upper deck, and are well supplied with light and natural ventilation. The officers generally have the advantage of a commodious reading room. A sick bay has been fitted up, and provision made for carrying a quantity of patent fuel. Additional mess accommodation has been secured on the lower deck by the removal of the sickbay, and better cabins have been allocated to the warrant officers.

The sea-going qualities of the Hecate under her altered condition were fully tested on her way from the Nore to Devonport. Saturday's experiments were directed to firing the four guns in the turrets, to test the strength of the superstructure, which is composed of ½ inch steel. Another object **** was to discover the best places for fixing the four Nordenfelt guns with which the ship is to be supplied.

The vessel is armed with four 18 ton guns, two in each turret, both of which revolve. The four guns were first discharged with scaling charges. Then the left gun in the fore turret was loaded with a full charge of 44lb of powder and a common shell weighing 400 lb and was discharged bearing on the port beam, at a horizontal elevation. The right gun in the same turret was next fired under similar conditions, but bearing on the starboard beam. Upon examining the superstructure it was found that two rivets had been started on the starboard side. The guns of the same turret were then fired with a battering charge of 70lb. of powder each and 400lb shell, but the concussion did no damage. They were then discharged simultaneously. The final experiment was the firing of an electric broadside of all four guns at once, bearing on the port beam. The concussion was considerable, but beyond the two rivets started, after the smallest charge, not the slightest damage was done — not even a pane of glass.

Other things that flicked my interest


I saw a model ship from Victorian times in a military Museum in Norfolk as I drove along the coastal road back to my home in the Fenlands. It was a pleasant surprise because the museum had a little more to look at than I expected.

In one section I saw a number of model boats. One of them HMS Hornet of the Dreadnought class or just pre-Dreadnought. I wrote a pastiche novel of H.G.Wells' War of the Worlds. It is called: The Last Days of Thunder Child. Although in my book, Thunder Child is visualised as a ship looking more like HMS Devastation the HMS Hornet, the model's figures of the sailors on board would look the same. I loved the look of the superstructure and the wheelhouse and the figure standing about in their RN uniforms of the era.

I could not help but excitedly snap the model in order to get a look at the sailors aboard. It sets my old imagination going into overdrive.  


To my further delight, I saw a paddle steamer called the Waverly. This little boat still exists and goes all around the British Isles to various seaside locations each year. When I lived at Southend-on-Sea she often came to the pier and took people out on excursions. I based the paddle steamer on the one in H.G.Wells' War of the Worlds when I wrote the Thunder Child pastiche story. Therefore, I had to click all. I have the image of the sailors aboard HMS Hornet for the uniforms of the day, the paddle steamer Waverly (re-named Southend Belle) for the fleeing boat full of refugees and the model of HMS Devastation for my mind's image of the fictitious  HMS Thunder Child.  


The model of HMS Devastation with her short barrelled muzzleloading guns are what I imagined Thunder Child to look like. Outdated, even in 1898, but able to pack a punch for the people on the paddle steamer in the Last Days of Thunder Child.


Wednesday, 21 October 2015

Giving You an Irish Historical Thriller



Set in Ireland of 1920. The small village of Cafgarven is caught up in the crossfire of a bitter exchange of gunfire. The local village priest is soon left in a dilema. Two men from each side need his help.

Go get today: In print and Kindle  The Black and Tan Summer

Friday, 9 October 2015

#LOL Jonathan Pie: Reporter's New Way of Presenting News COLD! HARD! TRUTH!




Jonathan Pie decided upon a new way of presenting the news. He does it by simply telling the truth. How bad is that? It will make you laugh and then it might make one think; "Hey wait a minuet; he's telling the truth."

It just goes to show how presenting the truth can vary from one concept to another, yet it is still the same old truth.

If this guy did present daily news on national TV, I bet we would all watch it. LOL.

 .






Monday, 5 October 2015

Best New SciFi Adaptation Book of Thunder Child Blazing Her Way Into Fantasy Legend.




New Sci-fi books are always looked out for. Good sci-fi books are in the realms of the reader opinions. For good or for bad, best new sci-fi books can only be hoped for by the author. Therefore, keep readers happy and hope for good sci-fi book reviews.




War of the Worlds Adaptation Retro Science Fiction Novel (The Last Days of Thunder Child)






The "Last Days of Thunder Child" by C.A. Powell, is a pastiche story from H.G. Wells's War of the Worlds; It shows us the original story from the fresh perspective of the ship's crew.


Here's an interview with author C.A. Powell: 

Fantascize.com: What's the novel about? 

Powell: The story takes place on board a small Victorian battleship cruising around the coast. They get semaphore reports but can't believe the communications they are getting. The only hear stories can see the huge and unusual amount of shipping. Being aboard a boat allows the reader to stay detached from the situation for a long time and cling to normality. However, all the time there is the knowledge of the realization of an approaching doom. 



Fantascize.com: How did you come up with this idea? 



Powell: It started from an idea at a writing class --an exercise, and I developed it from there. I live close to Maldon in Essex, UK, and like early Victorian ironclads. Plus H.G. Wells's War of the Worlds is one of my all-time favourite sci-fi novels. 
Fantascize.com: What did you like about War of the Worlds in particular?

Powell: The mayhem and uprooting of everyday life. It is suddenly vanquished for an apocalyptic world overnight. The social normality of things vanish and survivors have to adapt or perish. 



Fantascize.com: What's the most challenging part of writing a sci-fi novel?

Powell: Trying to view a world completely different from the one we live in yet moving through the story with your own values and conditioned social beliefs. 

Sunday, 4 October 2015

Would the Kingfisher Make an Appearance?





Once again, my wife and I decided to go over the bird hide at Mania in Cambridgeshire. It was a pleasant day and we had our coffee flask all made up. With camera, binoculars and a telescope, we set off.

On the way, we saw a Red Kite but could not photo it because we were moving along a country lane with a car close behind.

Upon reaching Manea we parked the car by the lock gates and began to walk along the bridle path to the hide. The one my wife always enjoys sitting in. As we entered the hide we were welcomed by a retired gentleman from the Yorkshire/Lancashire border. He said he was a Yorkshireman from West Riding. But back in the early 1970s, the local government decided that his village was now in Lancashire. Something he was not keen on and was quick to say the council or government was thinking of putting the original boundaries back to make his village, once again, in Yorkshire. He was a very sociable man and had obviously travelled far from his northern home to come to the Manea bird hides. He was on holiday with his wife and another couple who were keen country walkers or ramblers. He also told us that his village was next to the very place where Last of the Summer Wine TV sitcom was made.

He asked us about Welney bird centre and when it was that the floodplain would be allowed to flood for the winter. This is because it brings in flocks of various migratory wet warbler type birds.

We replied that we did not know exactly when the floodgates would open for the floodplain, but Welney, which is about 5 miles away, had staff at their bird watching complex. They would know. He seemed excited by this and asked more questions about the various wet birds he might see there.

We spoke at length and of the various raptors, we see at the fen in front of our bird hide. We also spoke of a vibrant blue Kingfisher that we had seen. The man seemed very interested in the Kingfisher and asked when and where we had seen it. We replied that it was in the very hide we were all in and it was roughly in the afternoon time. Again he got excited because he said that kingfishers were territorial and would have a set pattern of flight.

I did not hold out much hope of this but after about half an hour the man spotted the kingfisher and alerted my wife and me to the creature’s presence. I managed a few shots at a distance and selected a couple for the blog.



The man chatted for about another hour in which we saw raptors in flight. He then decided to give Welney a try as he was down on holiday. His wife and friends were still out and about rambling allowing him more time for further bird watching. He had a few hours to go before collecting his walker companions so he bade us goodbye and went off to his car along the bridal path and presumably off to Welney, where we hoped he would find an abundance of the wet birds he was looking for.


Saturday, 3 October 2015

Why is Daniel Hannan Writing A Letter of Warning to America? (Sometimes Politicians get too wrapped up in trying to teach and decide they no longer need to learn.)






Good and Bad from Mr Hannan's Interview

Mr Hannan made very good points about the positives of the USA and its ideology. We have all been lucky enough to prosper under the protective shadow of U.S. domination or influence. The world would be a sorry place without the USA. Many of us should realise that fact. The U.S gets scant recognition for this, but many of us outside of the U.S. are lucky for her existence.

Some things are hard to stomach, but much of what Daniel Hannan said is true concerning work ethics. I'm unsure about some of what he implies about governments in Europe. I cursed and cussed in my younger years while working under Thatcher's leadership. However, today I have what I have because of reluctantly doing my hard work (or what I thought was hard.) So I know I've been wrong with some of my more left wing views in the past. In this area, I must concede some ground to Mr Hannan's logic about work out put. 

He did, however, go on to mention something that made me pause with puzzlement. He said three Americans produce what four Germans would produce. Germany is a powerhouse economy in the EU and is prosperous? Maybe Germans enjoy a better standard of living from the work place. They are also renowned for quality production and a good national economy. Therefore a four German crew must be doing something right as well as the three man American crew. Perhaps he meant Europeans in general.

National Health Service

Today I'm different in my outlook of younger years and find much of what Mr Hannan mentions to be very stimulating. I do enjoy soaking up what he says, but I then have to sit back and think. I'm not in agreement with him about the U.K. National Health service. It is flawed, but we must try to continue and maintain it. I'm not a left wing person or socialist today. I would say I'm slightly right of centre concerning mass migration issues and benefits, but some things are worth keeping and paying for. Our National Health Service is one such thing.

I do think a American National Health service might be a good thing for a large number of U.S. citizens. I just can't agree with Mr Hannan's more negative reason concerning UK national health.

Such a U.S. Health Service will be flawed and open to abuse by peoples who do not contribute via National Insurance tax. (i.e. people outside U.S. trying to come into country and gain free health service) The U.S. would need to look at protocols to stop such abuse. There will be many problems reported. Look at the negatives of the UK Health system and make a better one. When Mr Hannan talks about British people complaining of trolleys in corridors, he is right on many occasions, but I can point out the millions of good things the British National Health Service does for its citizens. The good far out weighs the bad. If Mr Hannan only reports the problems and not the benefits we get an economical truth, and I'm afraid Mr Hannan is presenting a very economical truth on this national health service issue.



I think what I'm trying to say is that no one ideology is complete right or wrong. There will always be good and bad policies. I think he is right that the EU is full of its own self importance but can't deal with things collectively - yet. It makes lots of mistakes, but also gets lots of things right. Its evolving and making mistakes as opposed to remaining the same old, same old. The world has lots of options and lots of paths. The U.S. and the EU and the world will continue to adapt and evolve. The UK might be better off outside the EU and it will do well inside long term. I don't think either path will be catastrophic.

I don't think Daniel Hannan's book should be a letter of warning to America. The EU might find its way with some good ideas yet, but there will be a lot of bad ones too. Anyone looking in can decide for themselves. 

Mr Hannan also went on to say about care in the community and its draw back on certain issues concerning the lack of watching out for ones elderly neighbours and so forth. He complained that such things were put upon government and social services. Surely better government should be doing these things at local level answerable at higher level? Is this not what our better evolving society should be about? It is true that we have created such institutions that he might like to call bureaucratic bodies. These bureaucratic bodies have been formed with good reason, but people or neighbours still keep a look out too. He act as though this has suddenly stopped and we have all become automated and uncaring citizens. He neglects some of the old complaints about nosey Parkers taking too much of an interest in other people's business and so forth. I know this sounds pathetic and weak, but we do complain about unqualified people sometimes - don't we? I feel he is always giving just half a presentation wrapped up as a whole circumstance and then these are only the bits he wants us to see in order to win his point of view.

There are so many swing and roundabout issues and to claim the moral high ground on rather economic truths will always be around for development of political ideology. It sells books too, but if Mr Hannan wants people to vote for him, he needs to know he is the servant of his electors. Sometimes politicians get too wrapped up in trying to teach and decide; they no longer need to learn.


My One Big Brit say is this:

A national health Service can be a very good thing for millions of people, but big institutions will always have problems. Complaints about a trolley bed in an over crowded corridor can be made to look bad and immense. People should be held accountable in any Health system's failing for such things. However, (and this is a very BIG 'however') The amount of health care that the people of the UK's health system receive is extremely good. It is a little too easy to make it look bad, but the UK electorate rightly cherish it.

On this one fundamental note of National Health Care, I could never allow myself to vote for anything led by Daniel Hannan. He has a lot of very good ideas and views that he skillfully puts across. His notion of a failing British NHS is not one of them.